Future-proofing through openness

[account_disabled]

The study currently underway among policymakers on the topic of integrated platforms. If you have any questions about this study or would like to become a partner Tel and Tel will be happy to help you. Information about the study can also be downloaded here.  and flexibility When choosing an integration platform you must consider that attempts based on pure open source will almost always fail due to scaling. On the other hand if you want an enterprise level solution there is no way to avoid vendor lock-in. But if the supplier fits the company strategy then it will also fit in for the next five to 10 years.



So this should be seen less as a lock-in and more as a partnership. Multiple integrated platforms can also be used. If another platform is added through mergers and acquisitions, it is recommended to use unified platform management on both platforms to establish corresponding Kazakhstan Email List management of all interfaces and all overall visibility. No matter how you plan, you must take a long-term view. Questions like if you want to connect applications, how much will that solution cost in five years, things like that have to be figured out upfront and the practicalities of integrating the platform have to be figured out upfront as well.







Regulated areas still prefer local solutions. Production data is also reluctant to be exchanged via cloud solutions. But if demand increases or data volumes change, on-premises solutions often fail to scale. Possible usability issues discourage a pure solution. That’s why many companies have come to rely on hybrid solutions. Another selection criterion is flexibility. Many solutions may seem a bit rigid because they include everything you might need. However this does not mean that they also provide modules for different use cases and purposes. Last but not least every platform should be open enough to integrate different technologies and take into account personal criteria.

[TBustah!]