The problem with zero waste goals is the word waste

[account_disabled]

The correct term is zero waste . Most industrial systems are linear: A resource (which can be anything from wood to crude oil) is extracted. It is transformed into a product (generally without worrying about the waste produced along the way). You throw away that product when you are done with it. A circular system, on the other hand, prioritizes the regeneration of natural systems, the management of waste, and the search for ways to prolong the life of products. Towards circular thinking JIm Giles comments in Food Weekly according to GreenBiz that today food and agriculture are beginning to fulfill this first principle of circular thinking through the use of cover crops, rotational grazing and other regenerative techniques which are growing rapidly. Every week there are agri-food companies that want to highlight their sustainability projects, and very few focus on the idea of ​​redesigning systems to eliminate waste. Because? The most obvious answer is that it is cheaper to send waste to landfills. That's true in some cases, but there are many examples of companies discovering the value of what was once waste: A new InnovaFeed plant in Illinois will use crop residue from a neighboring corn processing plant to raise insects for animal feed. Upward Farms recently raised $15 million to combine fish farming with indoor farming: nitrogen-rich wastewater from fish tanks will be used to fertilize leafy greens. BioEnergy Devco transforms chicken excrement into natural gas. Zenb pasta and snacks, a new range from Japanese food company Mizkan, are made from plant parts that are normally thrown away, such as stems, seeds and peels.


The problem with zero waste goals is the word waste These companies are united by more than just innovative systems. Behind its processes and technologies is an innovation in thinking: That all materials are potentially valuable and should never be considered waste. And that's something we need more of. The industry has a very unclear mindset at the moment, when we talk to companies about the opportunities in waste streams, they tell us they are doing everything they can. Then we dig in and realize they don't know what's in those streams. Emma Chow, Food Project Europe Cell Phone Number List Leader at the Ellen MacArthur Foundation. That shortsightedness comes in part from something sustainability advocates often celebrate: zero-waste goals. Chow suggests that these targets have the unintended effect of labeling certain materials as having to be removed:The demand for green stocks does not seem to take a pause during the initial days of 2021, as reflected by the advance of exchange-traded investment funds – also known as ETFs – which have continued to generate attractive returns since the beginning of the year. after concluding a historic 2020. So far this year, the WilderHill Clean Energy (PBW) fund from the company Invesco leads the advance after producing 25.9% in less than a month, followed by the CleanTech fund (CTEC) from the company Global It has also appreciated 25.4% since the beginning of the year. Interestingly, these two leading funds have chosen to keep their exposure to popular EV stocks like Tesla (TSLA) and Nio (NIO) at bay even as investor appetite for buying Tesla stock doesn't appear to be dissipating not at all.





In this sense, it seems that other companies are more attractive to the fund managers in charge, with companies such as Plug Power (PLUG), Enphase Energy (ENPH), and Sunrun (RUN) recently sharing the set given the growing adoption of energy clean by companies and governments on a global scale. Given this growing appetite on Wall Street for pro-environment companies, the following article seeks to take a closer look at the complexities related to investing in ETFs, or even mutual funds , as vehicles to gain exposure to this interesting trend. Not all exchange-traded funds are the same Even though most ETFs covering the clean energy segment have been generating positive returns recently, an old adage known on Wall Street explains this situation simply: “a rising tide lifts all boats.” What this means is that the positive momentum that the sector has been experiencing has contributed to raising the value of the shares of most of the companies that belong to it, even though the quality of each one can vary significantly. For this reason, a closer look at the stocks in which each fund invests can better illustrate which instruments are influencing its recent rises, which, based on the potential of these components, can lead to concluding whether there really are merits. to justify current valuations.

[TBustah!]