School Accountability and Principal

[arfanho7]

At the same time they may also have personal preferences that impact their objectivity. This paper develops a framework for separately identifying the effects of expertise and bias on decision making and applies it in the context of peer review at the U.S. National Institutes of Health NIH.



I find evidence that evaluators are biased in favor of projects in their own area but that they also have better information about the quality of those projects. On net the benefits of expertise tend to dominate the costs of bias. As a result policies designed to limit America Cell Phone Number List reviewer biases may also reduce the quality of funding decisions. Download working paper hbs.edu faculty Pages item.aspx num Mobility How No Child Left Behind Affects the Allocation of School Leaders By Li Danielle ABSTRACT—The move toward increased school accountability may substantially affect the career risks that school leaders face without providing commensurate changes in pay.







Since effective school leaders likely have significant scope in choosing where to work these uncompensated risks may undermine the efficacy of accountability reforms by limiting the ability of low performing schools to attract and retain effective leaders.  importance of principal mobility in response to accountability by analyzing how the implementation of No Child Left Behind NCLB in North Carolina affected principal mobility across North Carolina schools and how it reshaped the distribution of high performing principals across low and high performing schools.

[TBustah!]

You probably couldn't find North Carolina on a map, ChiCom.