Minister Regina Helena Costa opened the disagreement, for wh

[anik4300]

The Public Defender's Offices should, according to the judge, appeal to the respective courts to contest the decline in jurisdiction before inaugurating the possibility of analysis by the STJ. She was defeated alone. IAC 14The use of one's own 14-year-old son to commit crimes, as it is a risk situation for a minor, is sufficient to prevent the granting of house arrest to the preventively detained mother, even if she is breastfeeding another child. reproduction Woman, mother of one-year-old child, allegedly used 14-year-old son to commit crime Reproduction With this understanding, the 6th Panel of the Superior Court of Justice denied the Habeas Corpus order and maintained the preventive detention of a woman prosecuted for the crime of drug trafficking, despite being the mother of a child under 12 years of age. The replacement of the preventive with the home was denied by the ordinary courts because the accusation is also the crime of corruption of a minor: she would have used her 14-year-old son to deliver drugs, in addition to storing narcotics and receiving users inside her own home.



To the STJ, the defense argued that, despite the accusation, the crime of corruption of minors was not committed against children under 12 years of age. It was also argued that, despite the seriousness of the conduct, there is no exceptional situation that would prevent a mother from breastfeeding her minor child, who needs her care. However, the rapporteur of the matter, judge called Jesuíno Rissato, denied the request. He poin USA Phone Number ted to STJ jurisprudence according to which it is appropriate to reject the house arrest of a new mother if there are indications of a greater need to safeguard public order and full protection of the minor. "The use of one's own child to commit crimes, as it is a risk situation for minors, precludes the granting of house arrest", he concluded. He also highlighted that the judge, at the custody hearing, granted the request for the child to be breastfed in a suitable place within the penitentiary. The vote in the 6th Panel wicardo Lewandowski, of the Federal Supreme Court, approved this Wednesday (22/3) the shared management agreement for the Fernando de Noronha archipelago. The document was signed by President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT) and the governor of Pernambuco, Raquel Lyra (PSDB).







Ricardo Stuckert / PR Ricardo Stuckert/PR Agreement was signed by Lula and Raquel Lyra, with the presence of Lewandowski The signature put an end to a dispute in the STF in which the Union claimed dominance over the archipelago, declared a World Natural Heritage Site by UNESCO and a fundamental area of ​​environmental protection. The litigation began last year, following a lawsuit filed by the previous government of Jair Bolsonaro. The allegation was that Pernambuco failed to comply with the contract for the transfer of use under special conditions for the island, signed in 2002. The conciliation agreement was filed with the Supreme Court on the 10th of this month. In the action, the Federal Attorney General's Office maintained that the state government made it difficult for the Union Heritage Secretariat (SPU) and federal environmental bodies to manage the archipelago, as it understood that article 15 of the Transitional Constitutional Provisions Act assigned the owned by Fernando de Noronha in Pernambuco.

[TBustah!]